Body language suggesting openness or expansiveness can affect success, according to a study newly out of UC Berkeley. When it comes to impressing potential dates, a little change in posture might make the difference between a swipe right and a swipe left. The findings, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, show that for the postures of both men and women, bigger is often better — and offer some insight into why those gestures are so attractive. In all stages of romance, body language does a lot of the talking. Positive facial expressions like smiling and laughing do double duty — they signal that someone is feeling close to another person and they also make that other person feel closer in return. But in the fast-paced world of speed-dating and dating apps like Tinder, first impressions are extremely brief, over with the swipe of a thumb.
Tips For A Successful Speed Dating Experience
An upcoming event at the U. For all of their big ideas, sometimes faculty are a bit like wallflowers at a high school dance; they need a little push to make the first move. Later this month, about 60 Southern California faculty will assemble at a long rectangular table, pitching research ideas to other faculty they may have never even met before.
Previous research has shown that between committed partners, gestures like nodding, smiling and leaning forward are linked to those partners’.
The UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center co-sponsored a speed-dating and pitch competition on June 29 to try to spark medical technology innovation. The top five teams that emerged from five-minute speed-dating sessions with pitches for new medical technologies won funding to help advance their ideas. The cancer center co-sponsored the event on June 29 as an innovation-focused competition.
We want to be the leaders. Teams came up with ideas for studying how colon cancer spreads in the blood, for studying radiation as a first-line treatment for sarcoma, and a potential new method for delivering pain medication to wounds. General Assembly for cancer research. She said she hopes to see the event continue into the future.
The top five teams determined by popular vote won funds. What we have proposed is a motion-activated drug release. Gu was co-senior author of a study published recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that detailed findings of research into a new, painless smart insulin patch. Their study found that the patch could lower blood glucose in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes for up to nine hours.
Knowing the severity, or stage, of the cancer is important to determine the type of treatment the patient will have to undergo, said Timothy S.
Speed Dating for Research Papers
Speed-date your research papers. There is nothing worse than taking home a pile of papers, spending a weekend marking them up only to have students ignore the marks, repeat the mistakes, and learn nothing in the process. Is there specific evidence in each paragraph? Is the paper formatted correctly?
We illustrate how to use Speed Dating by applying it to our research on the smart home and dual-income families, and highlight our findings from using.
Students will be able to identify and use appropriate databases to form an effective research strategy. Students will be able to differentiate databases based on functionality and content scope. This activity works best if all students are in the same discipline, although it can be scaled to include general research databases or multiple disciplines.
Part C asks students to quickly identify a research topic and evaluate their databases by searching for that topic. This will work if students already have a research topic in mind for an assignment. If not, you may wish to offer one or more examples for them to use, or skip it entirely. Skip to main content. Assignment Database “Speed Dating“. Submitted by Elizabeth Christian on February 26th, Share this on:. Short Description:.
UNC Lineberger hosts scientific “speed-dating” event to spark innovation
Suggestions or feedback? Previous image Next image. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Search MIT.
Using a “speed-dating” format, this professional development event will hone your ability to explain your research to laypersons. You’ll receive.
Collaboration, not romance was the name of the game. Photo credit: Urania Mylonas. When the first of my 14 dates sat down across from me, my stomach turned a bit. What if I got 14 rejections? After all, we came from such different backgrounds! Luckily my fears were completely unfounded. The goal? To help practitioners of the two disciplines find common ground and develop new professional relationships.
Lisa Phillips, co-director of PositiveFeedback, sees connections in the processes artists and scientists go through as well. And though their outputs might look different, even they share some similarities. Whether taking a stream of numbers and making a forecast or a thought or emotion and making a painting, both scientists and artists can take something abstract and make it more visceral of course the inverse can also be true.
My first date was Jeremy Pickard, founder of Superhero Clubhouse. The whimsical name belies a serious endeavor by a group of theater artists to write and perform original plays inspired by the natural world. Later in the night, installation artist Jackie Brookner took a seat across from me.
Weinberg and Moussawi collaborated with the other faculty members teaching the capstone Information Systems project course to explore how students could give and receive higher quality peer feedback on team presentations. They compared two different presentation approaches. Next, teams changed pairings, and the process repeated. Students completed brief surveys after each project-sharing session, and a sampling of sessions was observed by a trained researcher. According to the surveys, students reported giving and receiving more helpful feedback during the speed dating sessions compared to sessions with serial, class-wide presentations.
the database’s best features and content. Students then do three rounds of “speed dating” to share with other students what they’ve discovered.
Studies like the one at Ohio State University suggest that speed dating should, in theory, work. If we can determine whether another person is a good match for us in just a minute or two, then speed dating is an optimal approach to selecting a mate. Why waste time on some jerk when you’ve already decided that you’ll most likely never speak to him again? Speed dating also offers a structure that — in its brevity — encourages polite behavior.
And with the speed-dating service ringing a buzzer that signals the end of a couples’ time together, participants can relax knowing that they can largely avoid any awkward end-of-date moments. But do the rules of attraction still apply in speed dating? University of Pennsylvania psychologists examined more than 10, client responses from Hurry Date’s database and found that in the context of a speed date, the usual rules of attraction go out the window.
Factors like religious affiliation and earning potential — usually viewed as very important in dating — are replaced by behavioral cues. These cues provide the basis of attraction in a setting where time is of the essence and split-second decisions are made. The University of Pennsylvania researchers determined that Hurry Date’s three-minute format was longer than necessary — three seconds is about all it takes, said one researcher [source: University of Pennsylvania ].
Thus, speed-dating essentially lies at the intersection of person perception research and popular culture (Finkel & Eastwick, in press). Researchers can harness.
We all know about speed dating, where eligible singles come to meet and chat with a number of new potential partners for short stretches of time. Last week, we hosted a panel with experts from Gap Inc. While UX speed dating can take many forms, at its core it’s a methodology that uses quick, lightweight sessions to get fast feedback on multiple concepts during the product development lifecycle, not just at the end. Speed dating lets you accomplish early stage concept validation by testing a variety of concepts, pieces, or designs, and ultimately, better prioritize user needs.
With speed dating, you can bring in 6 people to be matched up with 6 different designers, moving around the room every 10 minutes to give feedback on each idea. As a methodology, speed dating is very malleable. There are many ways to adapt it to meet your needs.
Database “Speed Dating”
Speed dating is a formalized matchmaking process which has the purpose of encouraging eligible singles to meet large numbers of new potential partners in a very short period of time. SpeedDating , as a single word, is a registered trademark of Aish HaTorah. Speed dating , as two separate words, is often used as a generic term for similar events.
Company ‘speed dating‘ aimed at producing business opportunity If you have ever gone on a “speed date,” and even if you haven’t, you.
To support our nonprofit science journalism, please make a tax-deductible gift today. F inding new research partners can be a challenge for basic scientists and clinical researchers, as it may require them to step outside of their daily commitments. But it’s important: Meeting scientists from other disciplines can spark a new research idea or open the door to a solution to a problem that has seemed intractable.
It wasn’t a Gordon Conference. It was just, ‘Let’s see if we can make a connection and then take it further if we need to. This process continues until everyone in one group has met everyone in the other group. The goal, for translational research as for dating, is to find a match. More than 80 people registered for the event, and follow-ups with the attendees suggest it worked as planned: Eighty-five percent of participants said they met at least one potential collaborator, and seven pairs of researchers applied for internal pilot funding.
Science Speed Dating
Marriage data show a strong degree of positive assortative mating along a variety of attributes. But since marriage is an equilibrium outcome, it is unclear whether positive sorting is the result of preferences rather than opportunities. We assess the relative importance of preferences and opportunities in dating behaviour, using unique data from a large commercial speed dating agency.
A new study based on face-to-face evaluations of potential partners has confirmed some evolution-based theories about human attraction. The findings have been published in Social Psychological and Personality Science. This made me very sceptical about this area of research and got me interested in pursuing it myself. In the study, first-year psychology students had their body dimensions measured before engaging in round-robin speed dates.
The participants were given 3 minutes to interact with an opposite-sex partner. The participants also noted whether they would be willing to go on a date with the other person. The speed dates resulted in 2, face-to-face interactions, which the researchers then statistically analyzed. Consistent with previous research, men with broader shoulders were rated as having more attractive bodies while women with smaller waists and lower waist-to-hip ratios were rated as having more attractive bodies.
Buy the books!
Nonetheless the idea transfers well. Students are asked to choose one piece of sociological research that they find out about in depth. This can be from any area of sociology. At the speed-dating event, they are tasked with sitting with a different partner for five minutes, during which time each partner gets two and a half minutes to outline the research they investigated and argue for its objectivity or subjectivity.
Research has also shown that students felt they learn more when their group environment is positive (Bacon et al., ). However, group assessments are not.
The speed-dating format is designed to help students spot comparisons and contrasts between different ideas, answers or categories of information. By enabling students to consider or research one area in depth, and then exchange their knowledge against the clock with classmates, it is an efficient means of sharing ideas and knowledge. It works particularly well for topics where there are lots of key personalities to learn about: for example, in History this could involve a comparison of Roman Emperors, or the attitude of different types of people towards Hitler in Nazi Germany in.
Each student has a short amount of time to formulate their response to the question, and then students are paired up to exchange their ideas. Each student then adjusts their original answer to accommodate any fresh ideas from the discussion, then moves to a fresh partner. This process can be repeated over several rounds, and then a fresh question can be posed once all perspectives on the first one appear to have been absorbed. In this second round, the question can be considered in pairs before all students then move to a fresh partner for the first round of the new speed-dating activity.
The first step is to settle upon the most important areas of comparison and contrast. Once these have been decided, the next step is for each student to research one key individual in order to make notes under the chosen headings. Prior to the lesson, the classroom should ideally be arranged for paired work. Best of all is to arrange the chairs in the room in two rows, facing each other, ready for the conversations to take place.